Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to open2c.com

Startseite - Open2C / Kinetiqa · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
escholl.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jebliclient.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jeblics.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jeblik.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
kara-markt.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
karchernet.com
Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
novelt-solutions.com
Startseite - NoveLT Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
byamia.com
Startseite | ByAmia GmbH
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nws-at.com
Startseite - NatureWebservices Austria
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
erhanyigit.com
Erhan Yigit - Startseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ceusmedia.com
Start
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
pfahls.com
Hauptseite der Website www.pfahls.de
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nvon.com
Home - NWON 🚀
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
beratung-visgenix.com
Webseite veraltet? Kunden weg?
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nurguteseiten.com
Die B2B-Digitalagentur für Websites, Plattformen & Shops | re-lounge
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
plus-werk.com
Full-Service Digitalagentur für TYPO3, Pimcore und Shopware | +Pluswerk AG
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
dawema.com
DAWEMA | Digitale Lösungen: Integration, Webseiten & KI
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
orgabor.com
Orgabor e.U. | White Label WordPress Expert aus Reichenau an der Rax
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.