Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to opama.dev

Anas Ahmed | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
aleixalonso.com
Aleix Alonso - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
83match
iedwin.com
Edwin - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
83match
abhinavrajesh.com
Abhinav Rajesh — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
saqibsarwar.com
Muhammad Saqib Sarwar - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
anasmasama.dev
Anas Masama | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
errorplusone.com
Jiayi Wang - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
igormarracho.com
Igor Marracho - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ayjaygee.dev
AJ — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
alecrust.com
Alec Rust - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
deeoneandonly.com
Dee Xie | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
rainierts.dev
Rainier Sarmiento | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kargostack.com
Karen Go - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
afzalmiah.dev
Afzal Miah - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dawichi.dev
dawichi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aaronpetcoff.com
Aaron Petcoff, software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
amrsaquib.com
Amr Saquib | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kartikkoul.com
Kartik Koul | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.