Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to opaldata.de

Startseite - OpalData · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
kurrer-webservice.com
Kurrer Webservice Startseite
3 shared topicsweb-hosting
63match
arous.io
Website Erstellen | arous.io
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
pixelfaktor.com
pixelfaktor — Webseiten, die funktionieren.
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
growzeug.com
Prezanto — Wir präsentieren Ihr Geschäft.
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
plaentz.com
Prezanto — Wir präsentieren Ihr Geschäft.
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
b-ox.net
b-ox Solutions
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
bit-tag.org
BIT-TAG EK - Webdesign & OpenSource Automation
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
maximilian-heere.com
Home
3 shared topicsweb-hosting
62match
maximilianheere.com
Home
3 shared topicsweb-hosting
60match
a-mazing.net
a-mazing.de: @mazing - Die Web-Maximizer!
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
as-services.net
AS-Services – Eine andere WordPress-Site.
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
boehne.com
PC Service Boris Böhne Sindelfingen - Hardware, Service, Drupal, Hosting |
3 shared topicsweb-hosting
60match
rosemarieneubauer.com
Rosemarie Neubauer
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
56match
interxlink.com
Startseite
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
55match
kwerft.com
Startseite - k•werft
2 shared topicsweb-development
55match
doitclever.com
Startseite
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
55match
gwedevel.com
Startseite - GWeDevel
2 shared topicsweb-development
52match
actigo.cloud
Startseite - ARANES GmbH & Co. KG
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.