Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oodemi.com

Full Stack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
magfar.com
Magfar - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
batureren.com
Batur Eren — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
moizhassan.dev
Moiz Hassan | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
suraniharsh.com
Surani - A Full Stack developer.
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewzhuk.com
Andrew Zhuk - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
belispetre.com
Luiz Belispetre | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
beiniw20.com
Blair W - Full Stack Developer & SRE
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kobbyowen.com
Kobby Owen - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
sherertz.com
Ben Sherertz - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
anirudrarayamajhi.com
AJ Rayamajhi — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
heysonics.com
Ashish Gupta | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
ethanmoistner.com
Ethan Moistner - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
moistner.com
Ethan Moistner - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sharjeelafzaal.com
Muhammad Sharjeel – Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
maciejziemichod.com
Maciej Ziemichod - Full stack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anirban.dev
Anirban Sengupta | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anirbansengupta.com
Anirban Sengupta | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
benjaminserec.com
Benjamin Serec — Full stack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.