Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to onyx.com

ONYX | Development Pipeline · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
1xdevelopers.com
1x developers | Tech
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
matthaikin.com
Matt Haikin – Digital development consultant (research, policy, practice)
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
gregoryperozzo.com
Gregory Perozzo · Senior Software Engineer & Tech Lead
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
kundyendu.com
Kundyendu
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
piyote.com
Piyote A.Ş.
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
arifusion.com
Arifusion - Technology Innovation
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
felipe-gonzalez.com
Felipe Gonzalez
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
ioxayo.com
I/O × Ayo
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
rmglobaltech.com
rm-tech-website
3 shared topicsweb-development
53match
kuyumcu.dev
Eray Kuyumcu | Development Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
52match
grpdev.com
GRP Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
52match
nezdev.com
Nez Development Studio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
52match
piyonline.dev
PIY Online Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
51match
placelabdev.com
PLACELAB Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
51match
intyworks.com
Inty Works | Development Sandbox
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
51match
neutraltone.com
NeutralTone | UI Development Studio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
50match
thephasesofthemoon.com
MoonPhases Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
50match
internetcorp.dev
Internet Corp - Development Team
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.