Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ontic.dev

Jarl Victor Bjørgan | Software developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
alextendjer.com
Alex Tendjer | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andhana.com
andhana - Web & Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
essien.dev
Idong Essien | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
alexhaddad.app
Alex Haddad | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
oozman.com
Oozman | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
nsworks.com
N.S.Works is software developer.
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
rubenvanpoucke.com
Ruben Van Poucke | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
andrei-vasile.com
Andrei Vasile - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
afelder.com
Andrea Felder - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
erenwebdev.com
Eren Altaygil | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
rsoftwared.com
Royal Software Developments
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
agiletaiga.com
AgileTaiga | Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
ibrahimpg.com
Ibrahim PG | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
ryanbridge.com
Ryan Bridge - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aykutdag.com
Aykut DAĞ | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
orostegui.dev
Jehison Orostegui - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bytanner.com
Tanner Eschmann | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
1plusplus.com
Plus Plus | Software Development done right
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.