similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to one-bean.com

One Bean alternatives & similar sites

SEAD | Onebean makes better | Best Security Outlook Addin — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0patch.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Better Security Patches \| 0patch	en	information-and-network-security DatoCMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccrtsecurity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ccrt Security \| Blog	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neerajsihag.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Neeraj Sihag — Security Analyst & Indie Hacker	India~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catalystsecurity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Catalyst Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
protoxol.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Protoxol — Unified security operations platform	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
krusesecurity.eu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Krusesecurity	European Union en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prplteam.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Purple Team Collaboration \| Bridging Red & Blue Security Operations	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nestcipher.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Nest Cipher — Free AI-Powered Security Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
electronicwater.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Electronic Water \| Maritime Security - Anti-Piracy	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
0xfern.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	0xFern \| Independent Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscmulti-lock.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bsh1.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bp2.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bp1.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bn4.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bn3.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bn2.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscops-bn1.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSC \| The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider \| CSC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.