similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to onairsoft.com

Onairsoft alternatives & similar sites

RoseCross LLC | Offensive Security Consulting — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mediahacks.org ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	RoseCross LLC \| Offensive Security Consulting	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
crystaldefense.io ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Defense – Offensive Security Consulting Firm	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darksightsecurity.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security Consulting \| DarkSight	en	information-and-network-security Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anmasec.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Consultancy & Offensive Security – ANMASEC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katrinasec.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	KATRINASEC \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onelock.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	OneLock - Security Consulting And Testing Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersecurityconsulting.ie ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Security Consulting	Ireland en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyport.io ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	CyPort \| Security Consulting	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evans-it.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Offensive Security Specialists	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spydersec.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	SPYDERSEC \| Enterprise Cyber Security Consulting	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aniltadvi.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Anil Tadvi \| Offensive Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
pentestpartners.co.uk ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security Consulting & Testing	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pen-test-partners.co.uk ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security Consulting & Testing	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datasecconsultants.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Data Security Consulting \| Data Loss Protection	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7kcs.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	7KCS - IT & Security Consulting Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darkriverresearch.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Dark River Research LLC \| Cybersecurity Consulting Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xnano.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	0xNano \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4tifytech.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	4tify Technologies \| Information Security Consulting	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.