similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to olypus.com

Olypus alternatives & similar sites

Mr. Olypus | Tinkerer, Contractor, Security Researcher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
omobude.dev ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Timothy Omobude \| Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hebunilhanli.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	HEBUN \| Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
srdusr.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	srdusr • Developer + Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielpua.dev ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Púa · devploit · Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xmaruf.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	0xmaruf — Security Researcher & Bug Bounty Hunter	en	information-and-network-security WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ziz.me ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Abdulaziz Almadhi · Offensive Security Researcher \| 3ziz.me	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
omenbyte.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	OmenByte - Security Researcher & Full Stack Developer \| Cybersecurity Expert	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
base58.io ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Base58 \| Blockchain Engineering & Smart Contract Security	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aperbit.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Aperbit // Offensive Security & Protocol Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dacian.me ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	In your storage: exploring ethereum, solidity & smart contract security	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlyhaxx.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Fillmore \| Threat Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
espresso-sec.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Nemesis Contreras \| Senior Application Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danilo04.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Danilo Dominguez \| Mobile & Backend Engineer, Researcher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cyberhatlab.cfd ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Cyber Security Lab	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivecoding.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Samuel Cala, Security Engineer · SOC & SOAR Automation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apdiff.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Peter Bosch’s website \| Here I will share what I am working on, which includes programming, electronics and security research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heroicpanda.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Security for the Rest of Us \| Nathan Walker \| Substack	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexific.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Smart Contract Audit \| HEXIFIC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.