Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to oleduc.com

Olivier Leduc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
shkodenko.com
Taras Shkodenko web development linux system administration
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
retually.com
Retually - Web dev & Opinions
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
estebanborai.com
Esteban Borai | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
candiesocean.com
candiesocean • coding blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
8bitengineer.com
8 Bit Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anondeveloper.com
Anon Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
ridbyte.com
RidByte - Tech Blog & Software Development | RidByte
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
4amics.com
Xavier Perez Blog - LAMP blog for PHP&MySQL developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
angularcode.com
Angularcode
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
anjaramihone.com
Anja Ramihone : Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
gazzola.dev
Az Gazzola
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
ivtruck.com
Full Stack Python Developer - Montreal, Canada - Vickrum Ahuja
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
cameronthe.dev
All posts | Cameron the Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anirudtate.com
Anirud Tate
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
hertzen.com
Niklas von Hertzen
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
sustainable-rails.com
Sustainable Web Development with Ruby on Rails
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anmolteaches.com
Anmol Teaches
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
cameronmcdougal.com
Cameron McDougal - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.