Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to oldfartdeveloper.com

👴🏽 Old fart developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
iamtinsae.dev
Tinsae - Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
karelx.com
Karel Balogh — Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
pontusgavelin.com
Pontus Gavelin - Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
aarushbezi.dev
Aarush Bezalwar | Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
sayad.dev
Nazmus Sayad | Passionate Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
lumtw.com
Joe Lum — Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
samferree.dev
Sam Ferree, Developer/Architect
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
agusampietro.com
AguSampietro | Mobile Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kelsonqu.com
Kelson Qu | Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
pilaton.com
Mark Fish | Full-stack developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
karendeng.com
Karen Deng - Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
saulburgos.com
Jose Saul Burgos Backend Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
albert-sare.com
Albert Sare - Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
erenbalci.com
Eren Balcı | Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
samhalligan.com
Sam Halligan - Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
noukeosombath.com
Keosombath — Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
nikitsya.com
Nikita Smiichyk - Backend Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
7-views.com
7-Views - Developers Blog : 7-Views
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.