Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to olafurw.com

Ólafur Waage - Personal Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
kgurgul.com
Personal blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
kjuriousbeing.com
Personal Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
6nok.org
Fatih's Personal Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
derferman.com
Kyle Conroy's Personal Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
ignaciocarbajo.com
Personal Blog - Ignacio Carbajo
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
ethanmcox.com
Ethan | Personal Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arthurbricq.com
Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
nagimov.com
Ruslan Nagimov -- Personal Page
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
24natel.com
Nathan's Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
sinavahidi.dev
Sina | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ifaresi.com
Ifaresi's personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
goktugbas.com
Goktug Bas | personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
goktugberatbas.com
Goktug Bas | personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
eudriscabrera.com
Eudris Cabrera's Personal site
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ildiczeller.com
Ildi Czeller's personal website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
nbelov.com
Nikita Belov | Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
tevfiktumer.com
About | Personal Portfolio Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
renatnorderhaug.com
Renat Norderhaug's personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.