Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ojind.dev

Oubigee Jones - Tech | Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
gavineddington.com
Gavin Eddington | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ishaankataria.com
Ishaan Kataria | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
itspolar.dev
polar • developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
hetsaraiya.com
Het Saraiya | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
andrei-marin.com
Andrei Marin | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
4devs.app
Online Developer Tools
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
magfar.com
Magfar - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
djrfive.com
David Roach - Technologist and Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
gelzin.com
gelzin ✦ Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
5vra.com
Portfolio | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewrminion.com
Andrew Minion | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anudeepgi.com
Anudeep | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
iyuyui.dev
Yui Luong | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
maciejziemichod.com
Maciej Ziemichod - Full stack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
moizhassan.dev
Moiz Hassan | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
basmilius.com
Bas Milius — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
dipankarmaikap.com
Dipankar Maikap - Developer & Tech Writer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.