similar sites

Sites similar to ohyeahpb.com

matthewdurham · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

iAndy88 · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ALAWI CO · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

EPYZO · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

xanthippe · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

erthenvar · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

runnerable · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

byteflamesoftware.com

mrpowe07 (Matt Powers) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

epsilongruis.com

epsilongruis · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alderiosproject · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Denoncode (Denon Code) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

sophiahorizon.com

SophiaHorizon · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Kartiba · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

RyugujoDev (Ryūgūjō Dev) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eugenloncaric.com

eugenloncaric (Eugen Loncaric) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

olikode (Oliver T. Kolltveit) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Ervacon · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

dekuNukem · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

RTMux · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.