Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to ogewrites.com

Oge Writes – An overly active imagination · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
odettewrites.com
Odette Writes – Journey to Publication
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
mollie-writes.com
Mollie Writes – Freelance Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
beebopia.com
Beebo Writes – Fiction in Progress
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ridst.com
Ridst Novels – Short Stories,Big Imagination.
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
reyklb.com
ReyKLB – A boundless space where my imagination wanders
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
richardevansbooks.com
Richard Evans, Author – Imagination brought to life
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
mackenziekwrites.com
Mackenzie K. Writes – read. write. revise.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
hemantkumarwrites.com
hemant Kumar Writes – Stories That Resonate
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
iveeolivares.com
Ivee Olivares – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
montanarogers.com
Montana Rogers – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
shatiwrites.com
S. Hati – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
angiemichaelis.com
Angie Michaelis – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
estebancajigas.com
Esteban Cajigas – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
magnoliafay.com
Magnolia Fay Writes – Stories, Books, and Reviews
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
dldiener.com
D.L. Diener – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
dlphilborn.com
DLP Hilborn – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
dldotbailey.com
D.L. Bailey – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
ivanbaidak.com
Ivan Baidak – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.