Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ocramer.com

Owen Cramer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
andrewmanigault.com
Andrew Manigault PhD
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
koralkulacoglu.com
Koral Kulacoglu
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cameron-salazar.dev
Cameron Salazar - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
henokl.com
HenokL
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
dimiprousalis.com
Dimi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ko0d.com
KO0DE | Your Software Partner
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
mohamedmoselhy.com
Mohamed Moselhy | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
plumega.com
GP's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cameronstinson.com
Cameron Stinson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
diogomusou.com
Diogo Musou - Senior iOS Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
camilajenny.com
Kamil Lopuszanski - Software developer portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
iyanamarquez.com
Iyana Marquez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewdover.com
Andrew Dover
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
italomobile.com
Italo Ruan
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
connielok.com
Connie Lok - Software Engineer | Connie Lok - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
calvinrai.com
Calvin Rai
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
appfros.ch 🇨🇭
Appfrosch: Portfolio Site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
annastacia.dev
Annastacia Kioko
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.