Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to objectweavers.com

Object Weavers, Inc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
plexobject.com
PlexObject Solutions, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
obreathe.com
Object Breathe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
objectbiz.com
ObjectBiz Software, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
objectart-software.com
Object Art Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
objectaware.com
ObjectAware
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
objectweb.io
Web of Objects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
sushikaidoutest.com
M-PLM Project WBS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
svvktech.com
HomeSelect Web App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
pksoln.com
P/K Solutions, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
objectified.com
Objectified Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
objectifiedlive.com
Objectified Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
objectifthunes.com
Objectif Thunes, independent software studio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
conecomp.com
Conecomp Systems, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
macremsolutions.com
Macrem Solutions, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
projectpage.co.uk 🇬🇧
project page
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
henschen.com
Henschen & Associates, Inc
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
pnogo.dev
P N O G O Inc
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
sysmaker.com
Infopro, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.