Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oberjo.dev

Computational Researcher Portfolio | Terminal-Minimalist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
moinghaniwala.com
Teacher Portfolio – Ghaniwala Moin
1 shared topicsscience
67match
compimagingbook.com
Computational Imaging Textbook
1 shared topicsscience
66match
compneurohackathon.com
Computational Neuroscience Hackathon
1 shared topicsscience
66match
computationalclimate.com
Computational Climate and Ocean Group
1 shared topicsscience
66match
computationalocean.com
Computational Climate and Ocean Group
1 shared topicsscience
66match
kopec-lab.com
Computational Biophysics of Ion Channels
1 shared topicsscience
66match
helparesearcher.com
Help A Researcher
1 shared topicsscience
66match
cacrdelhi.com
Centre for Advanced Computational Research (CACR) | computational chemistry | Shanti Nagar, Tri Nagar, Delhi, India
1 shared topicsscience
66match
researcherbud.com
Researcher
1 shared topicsscience
66match
researcheri.com
RESEARCHERI
1 shared topicsscience
66match
mohitrajchiluka.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsscience
65match
researchervault.com
Home - researchervault.com
1 shared topicsscience
65match
compmotifs.com
Science through Computation
1 shared topicsscience
65match
researcherhome.com
Researcher Home – Researcher Home
1 shared topicsscience
65match
annaliski.com
Anna Liski Portfolio
1 shared topicsscience
65match
compoundresearchhub.com
Peptide Talk — research education
1 shared topicsscience
65match
researchequals.com
ResearchEquals
1 shared topicsscience
65match
apolloresearchsolutions.ch 🇨🇭
Apollo Research Solutions
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.