Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oathar.dev

Athar Ramzan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
hmzakhalid.com
Hamza Khalid
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
1deepaksrinivas.com
Deepak Srinivas
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
calvinss.com
Calvin Ssendawula - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andostronaut.com
Ando Ramanamihanta
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
ander-manas.com
Portfolio | World-Class Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
dineshram.com
Dinesh Ram
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
mohammedefaz.com
efaz@arch: ~
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
antonfedoruk.com
Anton Fedoruk
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
calvinvancreations.com
Calvin Van - Applied AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
jackruttan.com
Jack Ruttan
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
hmzdot.com
Hamza Karabağ
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
islamtayeb.dev
Islam Tayeb
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
applatitude.org
AI Agent Observability & Monitoring - Latitude
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
j3data.com
Data Science Portfolio by Jerry O'Brien
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
jacobheiberg.com
Jacob Heiberg official website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
revenantresearch.com
Revenant Research | Nathan Staffel | Substack
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
antekapetanovic.com
Ante Kapetanovic
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
connorfaulkner.com
Home | Connor Faulkner
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.