similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to nvreads.com

NVREADS Indie Lit · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Lytepen — African books & audiobooks by indie creators

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ShelfGlow - Where Indie Authors Get Discovered

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sweetreadsandtreats.com

Sweet reads and treats

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

shopindiebooks.com

ShopIndieBooks | Buy Books Directly From Independent Authors

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

acfwindiana.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

obsessedreads.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

disabilityreadathon.com

The Disability Readathon

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Indie author | G.B. Holley

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

reverseryanreads.com

Reverse Ryan Reads Podcast

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

plantinggoodreads.com

Planting Good Reads Library

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

shopwhatsarareads.com

What Sara Reads | Sioux Falls Mobile Bookstore for Women | What Sara Reads | Sioux Falls Mobile Indie Bookstore

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aanilittlecrab.com

Aani LittleCrab

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

eslquickreads.com

ESL Quick Reads

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home - AAC Reads

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.