similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to nuschler.com

Nuschler (Jimmy Verducci) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

brunorrr (Bruno Ricci) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

anyfld · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

moegyver (Moritz Rogalli) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Newbic (Antonio Andreucci) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dintho · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

connerpeirce.com

conner (Conner Peirce) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

krazos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Omayyga (--) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

modelrockettier.com

modelrockettier (Tim Schlueter) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

backendbit.ch 🇨🇭

mwieser (Manuel Wieser) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

maatko (Matko) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thatrex (Rex) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

svenkle (Luke Arentz) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

geferay · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

divotmaker · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

gellmann · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Machindo · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Objement · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.