Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to ntuwrap.com

WRAP – Writing, Reading and Pleasure at NTU · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
itsindiea.com
Indie A – Writing
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
susanjoneswriter.com
Susan Jones – Writer – My Writing Blog
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
dldotbailey.com
D.L. Bailey – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
annakosmanovski.com
Anna Kosmanovski – Writing with sparkle.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
itsemmaolive.com
Emma Olive – is writing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
monicabracelen.com
Monica Bracelen – PNW Based Writer & Reading Enthusiast
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
gaylenastasi.com
Gayle Nastasi – My Life and Writing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
antonrose.com
Anton Rose – WRITER
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
dlanesharp.com
D. Lane Sharp – writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
gayyellen.com
GAY YELLEN, AUTHOR – Reading, Writing, & the Rhythm of Words
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
angiemichaelis.com
Angie Michaelis – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
montanarogers.com
Montana Rogers – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
shatiwrites.com
S. Hati – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
monicabalt.com
Welcome to MonicaBalt.com – Writing for life
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annie-spencer.com
Annie Spencer – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
eunicekimwrites.com
Eunice Kim – Writer, Reader, Dreamer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
djamilaibrahim.com
Djamila Ibrahim – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
maedonovan.com
mae donovan – writer | reader | wizard
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.