Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to nmhowell.com

N.M. Howell – Spellbinding Fantasy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
jennapine.com
Jenna Pine Author – Immersive fantasy. Brave heroines.
3 shared topicsfantasy
65match
apocryphaofazazel.com
The Apocrypha of Azazel – A Fantasy Series narrated by The God of Death
3 shared topicsfantasy
64match
dcolemanbooks.com
Daniel Coleman | Fantasy Author
3 shared topicsfantasy
63match
innatraea.com
Innatraea | Fantasy Novellas by E.R. Zaugg
3 shared topicsfantasy
63match
emmagauthor.com
Contemporary Fantasy Novels by Author Emma G Rose
3 shared topicsfantasy
63match
rouodyssey.com
ROU ODYSSEY - Rou Odyssey Fantasy Novel Series™
3 shared topicsfantasy
63match
birgitberg.com
Dark fantasy & psychologically layered fiction | Birgit Berg
3 shared topicsfantasy
62match
oudandash.com
Omar E. O. | Author of Seeds of Tamuri — Epic Fantasy, Summer 2026
3 shared topicsfantasy
62match
blakerivers.com
blakerivers.com | home of author blake rivers | assassin princess fantasy author
3 shared topicsfantasy
62match
nocturnecodex.com
Helena Flinn Chronicles — Middle Grade Fantasy Series | Goblins, Dreams & Underground Vienna
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
emilyspencerkane.com
Home | The Chronicles Of Em
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
alancreedauthor.com
Alan Creed
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
indyguerrabooks.com
Indy Guerra Books
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
nikocranebooks.com
Ariadne's Thread — Niko Crane
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
nirasteele.com
Nira Steele
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
stveje.com
Home | S.T. Veje
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
sulasullivan.com
Author Sula Sullivan
3 shared topicsfantasy
60match
annewiser.com
Anne Wiser | Author
3 shared topicsfantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.