Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ninamunk.com

Home - Nina Munk · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
themusingsofkia.com
Home -
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
theprosepro.com
Home - The Prose Pro
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
bobbrooke.com
Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
rocabertiwriters.com
Home - Rocaberti Castle Writers' Retreat
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
kyle-word.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
matangold.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thekrusader.com
Home | The Krusader
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
benschulzbooks.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
themanuscriptmuse.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
clrissa.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kristineneeley.com
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
theothersideofmae.com
Home | The Other Side of Mae
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
thejournaling.com
The Journaling — Your Home for Everything Journaling
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
kyriakoskouzoumis.com
Kyriakos Kouzoumis
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
robinoquinn.com
Robin O'Quinn - Not really and author and not really a blogger but somewhere in between
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thenewyorkcritique.com
The New York Critique – GIVE YOUR MANUSCRIPT THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
robertgoolrick.com
Robertgoolrick - Essays on the Writing Life, the Craft, and the Long Slow Work of Building a Body of Work
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
robertolovato.com
Roberto Lovato
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.