Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ninamason.dev

Nina Mason | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
numanarif.dev
Arif - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
samcarty.com
Sam Carty | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ahmednagy.com
Ahmed Nagy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
karimwael.com
Karim Wael | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
nicklina.com
Nick Lina - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
royliustudio.com
ROY.DEV | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ajibolaojo.com
Ajibola Ojo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
husamdahliz.com
Husam Dahliz - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alechsu.com
AlecHsu - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
errolkeith.com
Errol Keith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
eseosa.com
Eseosa — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
bernardbarnieh.com
Bernard Barnieh — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
chaitanyap.com
Chait Pinn - Software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
m-to-b.com
Michel Busse | Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
pineger.com
Steve Pineger, Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
ephremasnake.com
Ephrem Asnake | Software Engineer | MBA
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
ahmadsyauqi.com
Ahmad Syauqi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
hypetech.io
hypetech.io | Software Engineering Studio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.