Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ninadtech.com

Ninad Chaudhari's Profile · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
codemine.io
codemine.io - High Profile Haskell and Rust Consulting
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codechauffeur.com
Code Chauffeur
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
thesystemsprogrammer.com
The Systems Programmer | Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
newview.dev
index | Paul’s Programming Projects
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alexvilvert.net
Alex Vilvert - Computer Science Professor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
benchanjamin.com
Benjamin Chan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kunyilu.com
Kunyi's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
maxprokopiev.com
Max Prokopiev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
theodore-chan.com
theodore chan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
aboutprogrammers.org
About programmers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
coderoaster.com
Nick Chamberlain
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
farahabdi.com
Farah's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
insiya-raja.com
Insiya's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
kscubestore.com
Sarik's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
matlabcoding.com
MATLAB Programming
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
matthewgh.com
Matt's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
softwaresailorgames.com
Port Programming
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
beerpla.net
Artem Russakovskii's programming and technology blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.