Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ninabowagner.com

Nina Bo Wagner Journalism Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
kulvirlehal.com
Kulvir Lehal Portfolio
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
69match
ngoetzen.com
Nina Goetzen - Portfolio
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
69match
themurrow.com
Independent Journalism & In-Depth Reporting
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
69match
gregbocquet.com
Multimedia Journalist & Journalism Explained
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
cobylobaugh.com
Portfolio | Coby Lobaugh
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
aggregater.org
The AggreGater | SF State Journalism Alumni
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
newmodeljournalism.com
New Model Journalism
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
thelibbyxo.com
The Libby XO Portfolio
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
a-lisa.com
Media Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
mattkadosh.com
Matt Kadosh | Journalist
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
nevadajournal.com
Investigative Journalism | Nevada Journal
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
newsbridgeai.com
Newsbridge - African Journalism Platform
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
newswire-africa.com
NewsWire Africa - Shaping the Future of Journalism in Africa
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
themalabarjournal.com
The Malabar Journal
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
accountablejournalism.org
Accountable Journalism
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
andydickinson.net
Andy Dickinson: Journalism, data and more.
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
ariellehixson.com
Home | Award-winning Journalist
1 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
investigative-manual.com
Investigative Journalism Manual
1 shared topicsmedia-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.