Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to niktrenchi.com

Nik Trenchi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
benjamincorey.net
benjamincorey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertwpearce.com
Robert Pearce
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
romanboba.com
Roman Boba
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ng-near.com
rgielen.net
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
dolevoper.io
Dolevoper
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
noahdoughton.com
Noah Doughton - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nkantar.com
Nik Kantar
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rodrigopinho.com
Rodrigo Pinho | Senior Software Engineer | Java | Spring | AWS | DevOps
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
soheiljafari.com
Soheil Jafari
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nicoc.io
Nico Chaves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
benchmarkjs.com
Benchmark.js
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kyleaclark.com
Kyle A. Clark
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adamnengland.com
Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
arkelziko.com
Arkel Ziko
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
donsbot.com
Control.Monad.Writer – Software engineering, compilers, languages
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
fernandofrancoswe.com
Fernando Franco SWE · Fernando Franco personal website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.