Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to nihad.dev

Nihad Mammadov — Frontend Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
onigirinik.com
Nikita — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
nurdanvayni.com
Nurdan — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
onurkeni.com
Onur Keni — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
nxndi.com
Nxndi - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
epinetov.com
Vsevolod Epinetov — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ntindev.com
Tin Nguyen | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ericcwong.com
Eric Wong | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
deborabucci.com
Débora Bucci — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sabzeparvar.com
Mojtaba Sabzehparvar | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
avastack.dev
Ava Stack | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
rubinahuria.com
Rubina Huria — Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aakashpai.com
Aakash Pai - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
safaakyuz.com
Safa Akyuz | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
saadmushtaq-dev.com
Saad Mushtaq | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
awaisdev.com
Muhammad Awais — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
iamshahidiqbal.com
Mohd Shahid Iqbal — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
olesiadev.com
Olesia Shakhrova — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
noye-dev.com
noye | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.