Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nightlightsoftware.com

Home | Nightlight Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
abbilaashat.tech
A T Abbilaash | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
rolandosorbelli.com
Home | Rolando Sorbelli
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
fergusonsoftwaresolutions.com
Ferguson Software Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
mattjonesdev.com
Matt Jones Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
matteobaggio.com
Matteo Baggio
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
thomascasez.com
Thomas Casez - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
maximec.dev
Home | Maxime C
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
softwarehs.com
Home - Softwarehs
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
bhavkushwaha.com
Bhav Kushwaha
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
abruce.me
Alex Bruce — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
guisalmeida.com
Home | Guilherme Almeida
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
maxasmith.com
Max Smith | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nicolasbiren.com
Nicolas Biren
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
codegregg.com
Home — Matt Gregg — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
mateusbezerra.com
Mateus Bezerra - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
matteo-marchelli.com
Mattéo Marchelli - Software Engineer at Impulse Lab
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.