Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nielsodegaard.com

Niels Ødegaard – Autor & Lebemann · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
ninawylie.com
Nina Wylie – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
nikapecunia.com
Nika Pecunia – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
doerte-jensen.com
Doerte Jensen – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
isabelnatter.com
isabel natter – autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
thomasgweiser.com
Thomas G. Weiser – Autor
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
irenereiserer.com
irenereiserer.com – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
dominik-meier.com
Dominik A. Meier – Autor und Schreibcoach
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
dorianzelmany.com
Dorian Zelmany – Autor | Bücher für Herz & Kopf
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
sophie-sumburane.com
Sophie Sumburane – Autorin, Redakteurin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kylaloo.com
kylaloo.net – Eine queere Autorenseite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
felixmeran.com
Felix Meran | Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
artdates.net
Richard Bergen | Offizielle Autorenseite
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
laetitiaahrens.com
Autor: Laetitia Ahrens – Ebozon Verlag
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
thomasknuewer.com
Thomas Knüwer | Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
l-kus-autor.com
L. Kus - Autorenwebsite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
7threalm.org
J. Weynand – Das Tor in fantastische Welten
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
nicksauerbooks.com
Nick Sauer Books – Das harte Leben von...
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
nicobauschat.com
Nico Bauschat - Autor von Horror und Thriller Romanen
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.