Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nicosesma.com

Nico Sesma · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
rodrigobaezgarcia.com
Rodrigo Baez Garcia | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
nfotiportfolio.com
Nicholas Foti | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arsenakishev.com
Arsen Akishev
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
dmautz.com
David Mautz | ETL Developer & Data Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mayurzala.com
Mayur Zala - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
djamel-bougouffa.com
Djamel Bougouffa | Full-Stack Software Engineer & AI/GenAI
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anirudhchintha.dev
Anirudh Chintha - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
l9lucas.com
Lucas | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewscaccetti.com
Andrew Scaccetti | Developer, Analyst & IT Support
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
kunalsable.com
Kunal Sable
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rodrigopsasaki.com
Rodrigo Sasaki - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
fedme.dev
Federico Meini
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexswensen.io
Alexander Swensen | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arneson.dev
Remington Arneson
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
piyushbarik.com
Piyush Barik | Full-stack Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
rmcsoftdev.com
RMC Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.