Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nicknaddaf.com

Nick Naddaf - principal technologist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
cloudytechnologist.com
CloudyTechnologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudgate.io
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudbornlabs.com
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudborngroup.com
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudborn.app
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudborn.io
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
cloudborn.dev
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
dokku.io
Matthew Winter, Technologist
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
themntors.com
Mentorcloud Technologies
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
cloudxim.com
CloudXIM Technologies India
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
neuvys.com
Neuvys Technologies Home Page
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
gtsap.com
S R Enterprises :: Global Technologies & Solution
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
cloudtechnologyoperations.com
Cloud Technology Operations
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cloud-land.com
| Muses from a Technologist working with some pretty cool tech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cloudtechnologyarchitecture.com
Cloud Technology Architecture
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
artemistech.io
Landing Page New - ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
piroinno.com
piroinno — Exploring Technology
2 shared topicscloud-computing
65match
cloud-alerting.com
Cloud Alerting | Cloud Technologies Newsletter
2 shared topicscloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.