Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickmantini.com

Nick Mantini · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
mattlantin.com
The Lantin Letter
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
arslanbekzhaparov.com
Arslan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
fengharry.com
Harry Feng
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mauro-castillo.com
Mauro Castillo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bnoje.com
Benjamin Noje
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
dogbonee.com
Caleb Rickenbach
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewfiel.me
Andrew Fiel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrsdev.com
andrsdev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
newwek.com
Newwek - Vladimir K. Principal Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
clynejoel.com
Joel Clyne - Software Dev
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
matejvavro.com
Matej Vavro
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softwaretoaster.com
Paperfolio - Portfolio Landing Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
software-transform.com
Semantic Designs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softwaremodernization.ai
Semantic Designs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softwaretransform.org
Semantic Designs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
rmehyde.com
Reese M.E. Hyde
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
robkumar.com
Rob Kumar's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.