Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickmadeira.com

Nick Madeira · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
nickmantini.com
Nick Mantini
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nicktietje.com
Nick Tietje
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
nickargyle.com
Nick Argyle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nickrawe.com
Nick Rawe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
robertjanicki.com
Robert Janicki
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattlaroche.com
Matt Laroche – Software Engineering Manager
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nickdavesullivan.com
Home | Nick Sullivan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
nicksarno.com
Nick Sarno | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nickfrankl.com
Nick Frankl
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nickfujita.com
Nick Fujita
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
nickzuber.com
Nick Zuber ⊇ Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benjaminmckinley.com
Benjamin McKinley
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
intertects.com
Intertects - Software Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
thesoftwareengineeringfiles.com
The Software Engineering Files
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nickbrodeur.com
Nick Brodeur
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
artofsoftwareengineering.com
ART of SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nick-nadeau.com
Nick Nadeau | CTO & Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
nicknad.com
Nick Nadeau | CTO & Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.