Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickipedia.dev

[ NICKipedia ] · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
kukosk.com
Kukosk.com - Jakub Kleň
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
gregwiechec.com
Grzegorz Wiecheć - Blog about programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
solarianprogrammer.com
Solarian Programmer | My programming ramblings
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
softwaretrickery.com
Programming | All About that Programmin'
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
able-lang.org
Able Language Workspace | able
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
kursatyurt.com
Kürşat Yurt
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
pinkhatcode.com
Pinkhat Code - Programming for fun
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alastairclarke.org
alastairclarke.org | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dkanen.com
David Kanenwisher
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
fandermill.com
Fandermill
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
grigorgeorgiev.com
Grigor Georgiev Programming Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
accessiblestem.org
Accessible STEM | Programming and STEM Lessons
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ioprog.com
ioprog – Programming for input/output
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
picolisp-explored.com
Functional Programming with PicoLisp
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robinrheem.com
Robin Rheem
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
newport-programming.com
Newport High School Programming Club
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
accu.org
ACCU
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
acpc.io
ACPC
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.