Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickgerace.dev

Nick Gerace Hacks · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
roguehacklab.com
Rogue hack lab
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abstracting.org
Abstraction Hacks
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3hh.dev
3 Hour Hacks - Build the Future
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
co-jones.com
Nick Jones
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
roninhacker.com
Ronin Hacker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
niaquinto.com
Nick Iaquinto
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
blueandhack.com
blueandhack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iorma.com
IORMA Futures Centre – embrace the future
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
8bithackshack.com
8 Bit Hack Shack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
4xura.com
Axura | Hacking is a mindset
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dojo-yeswehack.com
YesWeHack - Dojo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
grimhacker.com
GrimBlog – Just another hacking blog…
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
matecrew.com
Mate Crew | We hack your bottleneck!
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
newstechhack.com
Home - news tech hack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
socihacks.com
SOCIHACKS: Hackathons for Social Good
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
theroutinehacker.com
Routine Hacker | Get More Done In 2025
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
acegecw.tech
Ace CSE
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexandretsetskhladze.com
Alexandre Tsetskhladze — Hackathons
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.