Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickfrankl.com

Nick Frankl · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
nickfujita.com
Nick Fujita
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
nickargyle.com
Nick Argyle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nickbrodeur.com
Nick Brodeur
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
nickbdyer.com
nickbdyer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nickdelaguila.com
Nick Del Aguila
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
nickbp.com
nickbp
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nickdavesullivan.com
Home | Nick Sullivan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
0length.com
AeroNotix (Aaron France) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
arhaankeshwani.com
Arhaan Keshwani
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nick-nadeau.com
Nick Nadeau | CTO & Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
rogerripley.com
Roger Ripley
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
gsemenov.com
George Semenov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
therootelement.com
frankylee kelly // Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
bluesharkfriends.com
Blue Shark Friends - Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
nicholasasimov.com
Nick Asimov | Software Team Lead
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
benjaminskolnick.com
Benjamin Skolnick - Software Architect
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benskolnick.com
Benjamin Skolnick - Software Architect
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nickderobertis.com
Nick DeRobertis' Personal Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.