Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickcanarelli.com

Nick Canarelli | Freelance Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rizwaan.dev
Rizwaan Bana — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nguyendev.dev
Lukasz Nguyen — Freelance Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
mawburn.com
Matt Burnett | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
kunal-jain.com
Kunal Jain - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
rjlaasish.com
Aasish Rijal | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alexmnorris.dev
Alex M. Norris | Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ankitapatil.dev
Ankita Patil | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
arthurviana.com
Arthur Viana - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
diyapatel42.com
Diya Patel — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kzotos.com
Kostas Zotos | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
romaura.com
Robbin Ramos - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
aaronpetcoff.me
Aaron Petcoff, software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kumailali.com
Kumail Ali — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
abhinavranjith.dev
Abhinav Ranjith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.