Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nickargyle.com

Nick Argyle · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
robertjanicki.com
Robert Janicki
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
rokatzo.com
Rokatzo
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewfiel.me
Andrew Fiel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mattlantin.com
The Lantin Letter
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
greglarrenaga.com
Greg Larrenaga | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rojinsharma.com
Rojin Sharma — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
cloaksky.com
Michael Yarmoshik
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
domainutil.com
Michael Yarmoshik
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mathiasbc.com
MathiasBC | Software Architect
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pierrerambaud.com
Pierre Rambaud - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
theohayeck.com
Theo Hayeck
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bonganimbigi.com
Bongani Mbigi's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
farah-arabian.com
Farah Arabian
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rlxone.com
Dzmitry Miadziukha — Teletype
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
sohaibsblog.com
Sohaib's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.