Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nicepublications.com

Home - Nice Publications · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
nextleafpub.com
Home - Next Leaf Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acgpubs.org
ACG Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
rk-publication.com
Home | R K Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
guid-publications.com
Guid Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
ippmagz.com
Home - IPP Catalog Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
thesciencemedia.com
SMRG Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
bigwavepublications.com
Big Wave Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
ipinnovative.com
Home - IP Innovative Publication
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
adpublication.org
A D Publication
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
aarekhpublications.com
Aarekh Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
solsonpublications.com
Solson Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
sonar4publications.com
Sonar4 Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
arijes.com
Home - Arijes Technical Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
co-oppublications.com
Home - The Co-op Publications Network
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
blueleafpub.com
Blue Leaf Publications
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
thequillhouse.com
Quill House Publication
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
asmita.info
Asmita Publication
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
sure-media.co.uk 🇬🇧
Sure Media Publications - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.