Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nicbarker.com

Nic Barker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
dombrowne.com
Dominic Browne
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkelziko.com
Arkel Ziko
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rohinibarla.com
Rohini Kumar Barla
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kuniwak.com
About Kuniwak
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
dominiclim.dev
Dominic Lim
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alastairclarke.org
alastairclarke.org | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrewgarcia.tech
Andrew Garcia – Programmer & Developer Advocate
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
maycontaincode.com
May Contain Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bobgreen.ai
bobgreen.net, home of programmer Bob Green
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
camerondoyle.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Doyle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
argumatronic.com
argumatronic -
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
djrollins.com
Daniel J. Rollins The Inquisitive Programmer | Inquisitive programmer spelunking through C and C++, systems programming and games development.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
theprogrammersoath.com
The Programmer's Oath
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ankitadhar.tech
Dharmatic Bytes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
rondvorak.com
Ron's Home Page v. 1.001
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
programmer.web.id 🇮🇩
Programmer - World of Programmer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andybitz.io
hello ^•^/
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.