Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nhatcher.com

Nicolás Hatcher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
kodeninja.dev
Home • KodeNinja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
heyeduardo.com
Eduardo Rocha | Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mortondev.com
James Morton — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
nurdli.com
Jesse Johnson
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
helabenkhalfallah.com
Code, Craft & Community - Sharing my journey in software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
gdovicak.com
Ben Gdovicak
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
moisesguimaraes.com
Moisés Guimarães
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iszlai.com
iszlai's data, code & coffee · iszlai's data, code & coffee
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
occasionallygood.com
Occationally Good | Occasionally Good
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ivaliullin.com
Welcome to Ilsur's blog! | Ilsur Valiullin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
baswanders.com
Bastiaan Wanders
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
esimmler.com
An Irregularity
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
moicko.com
Moicko
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
batchofcode.com
Batch of Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
calebukle.com
Caleb Ukle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nvankempen.com
Nicolas van Kempen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrelousamarques.com
André Lousa Marques
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.