Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nhann.com

Nhan Nguyen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
nguyen-au.com
Hoa Van Nguyen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
nguyenvietyen.com
Dr. Viet Yen Nguyen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
ngxson.com
Xuan Son NGUYEN - Software engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
rohanpavuluri.com
Rohan Notes
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
nguyendaniel.com
daniel nguyen — deployment strategist
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
nguyenvlm.com
nguyenvlm’s playground
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
a2vibecreators.com
A2 Vibe Creators | Suman Addanke
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bhushan.ai
Bhushan Shitole
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
blooddirtductape.com
The Erasure
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
blue-enigma.com
Blue Enigma | AI product development
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
iqbalfajar.dev
Iqbal Fajar | Software Developer - Aspiring AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
rohanpatra.com
Rohan Patra
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
dobbincode.com
Ethan Dobbin
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
therasys.ai
Therasys
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
roshanjonah.com
Roshan AIOps
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
invaris.ai
Invaris — AI-Driven Development, Testing & DevOps | Dobby Test Automation
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
matrixaitech.com
Matrix AI Tech: Innovating Education | Matrix Ai Tech
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
rohandas.com
Rohan Das
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.