Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ngoma.dev

Rupert Dunk · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andresflores.com
Andrés Flores, consultant, developer & designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bobbydylla.com
Robert Dylla
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alexpotter.me
Alex Potter
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
arisawilliams.com
Arisa Williams
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aaronbates.me
Aaron Bates
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
robertogalasso.com
Roberto Galasso | Full Stack developer | DevOps Architect
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
matthewapower.com
Matthewapower | Matthew A Power
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
robertwilliamashton.com
About Robert Ashton Web Services
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
brilliantwebsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Brilliant Web Solutions - Web Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
amandapatschke.com
Amanda Patschke | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
amberbrookhuis.dev
Amber Brookhuis | Amber Brookhuis – Frontend Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
matt-long.com
Matthew Long | Frontend + UX
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
robwaymouth.com
Rob Waymouth
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
adamjbragg.net
Adam J Bragg
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
kristidelfino.com
Kristi Delfino Web Design | Kristi Delfino Web Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
abrahamperez.net
Abraham Pérez — Web Developer & UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
kyletozer.com
Kyle Tozer | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
lawriecape.co.uk 🇬🇧
Lawrie Cape - Creative Front-End & Javascript Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.