Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ngbrandon.com

Brandon Bing Ng · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
aldr.io
Brandon Aldrich
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mateendev.com
Mateen — Frontend Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andyvazquez.dev
Andy Vazquez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
behnvm.dev
Brand
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
fernandocgomez.com
Fernando Gomez — Front-End Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
alanxgarcia.dev
Alan Garcia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
felix-huang.com
Huang Rao | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
codearoy.com
Ashish Kumar Roy - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
rodluis.com
Luis Rodriguez — Full-Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
arnaudtison.com
Arnaud Tison - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
pierrehouy.com
Pierre Houy - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
krogoz.com
Front-End Web Developer - Kacper Rogoz
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
fayokunmiosho.com
Fayokunmi Osho - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
kuroshhusseini.com
Kurosh Husseini | Full Stack Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aridan.dev
Aridan Pantoja — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
newtriks.com
Simon Bailey Home Page
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anjolaoluwa.dev
Adegbola Anjolaloluwa Samuel
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aanshh.dev
Ansh | Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.