Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nflverse.com

nflverse · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mb-media.net
vonWeihermuehle · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
therealdev.com
Josh-XT (Josh XT) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
albatross-kb.com
Library of Possibility · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
clineventures.com
tom-cline (Tom Cline) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
mattjberry.com
mberry-hub (Matt Berry) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
soobinrho.com
soobinrho (Soobin Rho) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kybouw.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kylebouwman.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
adag.io
rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
berankovi.net
Kobzol (Jakub Beránek) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
inutilfutil.com
paulo-raca (Paulo Costa) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.