Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nfgab.com

Home - Nordic Fastening Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
thenpgroups.com
Home - Np Groups
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
newmastersgroup.com
Home - New Masters Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
groupefdn.com
Home - FDN Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
adfonlinetraining.uk 🇬🇧
Home - ADF Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
adfgroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - ADF Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
adfgroup.uk 🇬🇧
Home - ADF Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
adfonlinetraining.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - ADF Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
asc-group.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - ASC Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
biosoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - DMA Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
dma-group.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - DMA Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
armed-group.com
Home - Armed Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
kumarcom.com
Home - Kumar Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
fed-congroup.com
Home - Fedcon Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
mayuragroup.com
Home - MAYURA GROUP
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
mctechgroup.com
Home - McTech Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
griffongroupconsulting.com
Home - Griffon Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
ksgroupin.com
Home - KSGroup
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
3dcontractinggroup.net
Home | 3D Contracting Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.