Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nexgea.dev

Nexgea · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
nexgea.com
Nexgea
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maxgallo.io
Max Gallo
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
favalcodes.com
Favalcodes
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
solidwiki.com
Professional MediaWiki Development & Enterprise Wiki Solutions - MediaWiki Development Services | Corporate Wiki Solutions | SolidWiki
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bhupeshverma.com
Bhupesh verma
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
adityas.me
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
armanitran.com
Armani Tran Ung
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
romaricguth.com
Romaric Guth | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
theofargeas.com
@theofrgs project vault
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mattmegaard.com
Matt Megaard
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
abelhailemichael.dev
Abel Hailemichael - Homepage
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bobren.com
Bob's Site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mathewbushuru.com
Mathew Bushuru | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
albert-gonzalez.dev
Albert González - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andytang.dev
Andy's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
adityashaw.tech
Aditya Shaw
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andrewclark.io
Andrew Clark
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
federicobarreiro.com
Federico Barreiro
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.