Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to nexb.com

nexB - What's in your software! · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
ko0d.com
KO0DE | Your Software Partner
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
1dersoftware.com
1DER Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bebyaz.com
BEB Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rghsoftware.com
RGH Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
lyonsw.com
Lyon Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
moqod.com
Moqod | Your software development partner
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
6tacos.com
6Tacos Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
2la-software.com
2LA Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
24usoftware.com
24U Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ocumps.com
Ocumps Ecosystem - Solution Of Your Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
3-03software.com
3-03 Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
machinekoder.com
Alexander Poss - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
mooncurse.com
Anacronist Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
o-lap.com
O-LAP Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
pixyz-software.com
Pixyz Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
slatesoftware.com.au 🇦🇺
Slate Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
resistorsoftware.com
Home | Resistor Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
avalonsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Avalon Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.